<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Peter.vdHamer.com &#187; Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peter.vdhamer.com/category/it/sw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peter.vdhamer.com</link>
	<description>Reusable thoughts on pixels and bits.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 10:53:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19827</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Memory of Colors&#8221; by Jaime Ocampo-Rangel</title>
		<link>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2011/03/04/memory-of-colors/</link>
		<comments>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2011/03/04/memory-of-colors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 21:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pvdhamer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fotopedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ocampo-Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.vdhamer.com/?p=2273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A version of this article has also been published on the photography site The Luminous Landscape. Memory of Colors is the name of large-scale ongoing photography project by the Colombian/French photographer Jaime Ocampo-Rangel. His wife Lia Ocampo-Rangel, a videographer, also &#8230; <a href="http://peter.vdhamer.com/2011/03/04/memory-of-colors/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2011/03/04/memory-of-colors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fotopedia &#8211; some missing guidelines</title>
		<link>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/11/27/fotopedia-missing-guidelines/</link>
		<comments>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/11/27/fotopedia-missing-guidelines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pvdhamer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fotopedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.vdhamer.com/?p=1894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following are suggested extra guidelines for people who contribute or evaluate photos for Fotopedia. They are meant to support Fotopedia&#8217;s goal of being simultaneously an encyclopedia (well-documented, trustworthy) and aesthetics (coffee table book). The following are thus suggestions for &#8230; <a href="http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/11/27/fotopedia-missing-guidelines/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/11/27/fotopedia-missing-guidelines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fotopedia &#8211; statistics (2/2)</title>
		<link>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/11/16/fotopedia-statistics-2/</link>
		<comments>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/11/16/fotopedia-statistics-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pvdhamer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fotopedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Temporary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MatLab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.vdhamer.com/?p=1868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part 1 of this article provided some graphs showing the rate of growth of Fotopedia. The main conclusion was that the growth was steady (&#8220;linear&#8221; for geeks), but not enough to propel Fotopedia into the realm of the really well-known &#8230; <a href="http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/11/16/fotopedia-statistics-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/11/16/fotopedia-statistics-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fotopedia &#8211; statistics (1/2)</title>
		<link>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/10/23/fotopedia-statistics-1/</link>
		<comments>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/10/23/fotopedia-statistics-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 21:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pvdhamer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fotopedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.vdhamer.com/?p=1766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This posting focuses on the quantity of Fotopedia photos, while a previous posting focuses on the quality of Fotopedia photos. It is based on daily "measurements" starting on September 17th 2010 and currently covers about 5 weeks. <a href="http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/10/23/fotopedia-statistics-1/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/10/23/fotopedia-statistics-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fotopedia &#8211; the rating system (2/2)</title>
		<link>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/10/02/fotopedia-rating-2/</link>
		<comments>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/10/02/fotopedia-rating-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 12:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pvdhamer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fotopedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.vdhamer.com/?p=1700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last modification: 28-Nov-10 After all this background discussion in part 1, it&#8217;s time to get more concrete about actual problems and possible solutions&#8230; Issue #1: Great photo &#8211; wrong article &#160; Photo of Plaza_de_España (Seville) that was accidentally linked to &#8230; <a href="http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/10/02/fotopedia-rating-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/10/02/fotopedia-rating-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fotopedia &#8211; the rating system (1/2)</title>
		<link>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/09/17/fotopedia-rating-1/</link>
		<comments>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/09/17/fotopedia-rating-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 18:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pvdhamer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fotopedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.vdhamer.com/?p=1541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last modification: 2-Oct-10 Fotopedia&#8216;s system for ranking the quality and suitability of photos is is based on counting votes. This results in cumulative ratings like +2 (few people have seen the image, or maybe people don&#8217;t like it) , +22 &#8230; <a href="http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/09/17/fotopedia-rating-1/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/09/17/fotopedia-rating-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fotopedia</title>
		<link>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/08/29/fotopedia/</link>
		<comments>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/08/29/fotopedia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pvdhamer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photo Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fotopedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.vdhamer.com/?p=1493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fotopedia is a photography-centric encyclopedia founded in 2009. It aims to provide a dynamically growing collection of high-quality photos on topics of general interest. Some examples of topics covered by Fotopedia: Barcelona (travel) FC Barcelona (sports, fans) Antoni Gaudí (Barcelona &#8230; <a href="http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/08/29/fotopedia/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/08/29/fotopedia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lightroom 3 review</title>
		<link>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/06/12/lightroom3/</link>
		<comments>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/06/12/lightroom3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pvdhamer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photo Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DxO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightroom 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.vdhamer.com/?p=1216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adobe released Lightroom 3.0 on June 8th, after eight months of public beta testing. I simply kept using LR 2.7 during the beta testing period as the beta version didn&#8217;t allow you to easily import LR 2.x databases, and I &#8230; <a href="http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/06/12/lightroom3/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/06/12/lightroom3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After the Deadline spell checker</title>
		<link>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/06/05/after-the-deadline-spell-checker/</link>
		<comments>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/06/05/after-the-deadline-spell-checker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pvdhamer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Information Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[After the Deadline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automattic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spelling checker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.vdhamer.com/?p=1134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just installed &#8220;After the Deadline&#8221; on this blog. AtD is a  plug-in for WordPress, Firefox and certain other platforms. It detects three different types of errors &#8211; each marked in its own color: spelling checking makes sure I don&#8217;t &#8230; <a href="http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/06/05/after-the-deadline-spell-checker/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/06/05/after-the-deadline-spell-checker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress 3 Beta</title>
		<link>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/04/20/wordpress-3-beta/</link>
		<comments>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/04/20/wordpress-3-beta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pvdhamer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theme for WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.vdhamer.com/?p=1058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On April 20th I switched to WordPress 3.0b1 (actually the latest &#8220;nightly build&#8221;) after testing the original 3.0b1 offline. I subsequently started manually following &#8220;nightly builds&#8221; which got me to WordPress 3.0b2. It all works fine &#8211; even with the patched &#8230; <a href="http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/04/20/wordpress-3-beta/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peter.vdhamer.com/2010/04/20/wordpress-3-beta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

