Comments on: Save the image highlights! http://peter.vdhamer.com/2009/10/04/saving-the-image-highlights/ Reusable thoughts on pixels and bits. Thu, 29 Dec 2011 23:36:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19827 By: Lightroom 3 « Peter.vdHamer.com http://peter.vdhamer.com/2009/10/04/saving-the-image-highlights/comment-page-1/#comment-626 Lightroom 3 « Peter.vdHamer.com Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:27:15 +0000 http://peter.vdhamer.com/?p=763#comment-626 [...] EXIF data: ISO 200 with Hightlight Tone Protection enabled (essentially underexposed!), 32mm, f/6.7, 1/250, tripod, raw @ 21 MPixels. In addition, the original image was by 1 stop too [...] [...] EXIF data: ISO 200 with Hightlight Tone Protection enabled (essentially underexposed!), 32mm, f/6.7, 1/250, tripod, raw @ 21 MPixels. In addition, the original image was by 1 stop too [...]

]]> By: Risto Savolainen http://peter.vdhamer.com/2009/10/04/saving-the-image-highlights/comment-page-1/#comment-544 Risto Savolainen Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:37:02 +0000 http://peter.vdhamer.com/?p=763#comment-544 I just discuused with a Canon representative here in Finland. He said, that HTP affects the RAW also. There is a patented, not fully public procedure to preserve the highlights in the RAW. He asked me to make some tests not caring about the` burning indicators´ in the back of canera LCD. Of course there is a limit, but it is higher than without HTP. Sakke I just discuused with a Canon representative here in Finland. He said, that HTP affects the RAW also. There is a patented, not fully public procedure to preserve the highlights in the RAW. He asked me to make some tests not caring about the` burning indicators´ in the back of canera LCD. Of course there is a limit, but it is higher than without HTP.

Sakke

]]> By: pvdhamer http://peter.vdhamer.com/2009/10/04/saving-the-image-highlights/comment-page-1/#comment-541 pvdhamer Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:54:01 +0000 http://peter.vdhamer.com/?p=763#comment-541 Good point: does Hightlight Tone Priority a) change the raw image data b) automatically get applied on most post-processing software (obviously the case for Canon, reports are that it does something, but less than on JPEGs) c) get ignored by typical post-processing software (with the exception of Canon's). Not sure yet... Peter Good point: does Hightlight Tone Priority
a) change the raw image data
b) automatically get applied on most post-processing software (obviously the case for Canon, reports are that it does something, but less than on JPEGs)
c) get ignored by typical post-processing software (with the exception of Canon’s).
Not sure yet…

Peter

]]> By: Risto Savolainen http://peter.vdhamer.com/2009/10/04/saving-the-image-highlights/comment-page-1/#comment-540 Risto Savolainen Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:39:02 +0000 http://peter.vdhamer.com/?p=763#comment-540 Good wrap-up. I am still not sure whether the Canon HTP affects RAW or not. It would be interesting to know. Here is a link to one explanation of Nikon´s D-lighting: http://www.xpherion.com/wp/index.php/photography/nikon-d-lighting-demystified/ Sakke Good wrap-up. I am still not sure whether the Canon HTP affects RAW or not. It would be interesting to know. Here is a link to one explanation of Nikon´s D-lighting: http://www.xpherion.com/wp/index.php/photography/nikon-d-lighting-demystified/

Sakke

]]>